Warning: Undefined array key "HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE" in /home/u596154002/domains/usbusinessreviews.com/public_html/wp-includes/load.php on line 2057

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the rank-math domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/u596154002/domains/usbusinessreviews.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
CMS removes prior authorization for select orthopedic devices - Best Business Review Site 2024

CMS removes prior authorization for select orthopedic devices

[ad_1]

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services removed prior authorization requirements for a small set of orthopedic procedures as regulators continue to adjust the controversial approval process. 

CMS issued a final rule Tuesday that indefinitely suspended prior authorization for urgently needed procedures involving spine and knee braces. The agency announced in January that it will more frequently update the mandatory list of durable medical equipment, prosthetic and orthotic procedures requiring insurers’ approval before providers are paid. 

CMS looks to add procedures to the prior authorization list that have irregular billing patterns, are high cost and low value, or have been identified in a government report. Regulators will remove prior authorization requirements for treatment that are low cost, low risk and high value, the agency said. 

The removal of prior authorization for infrequently overused and high-value clinical services is an important step forward, said Dr. Mark Fendrick, a professor of internal medicine and health management and policy at the University of Michigan.

“This is a service that most would say doesn’t need to have a barrier. Let’s not put up barriers for clinical services that help people and are infrequently overused,” he said. “There’s too much attention on how prior authorization is actually implemented as opposed to the services for which prior authorization is placed.”

Prior authorization has long been a sticking point between providers and insurers. The intent is to weed out procedures that are prone to fraud and abuse, unnecessarily expensive or ineffective. But it has led to delays in patient care and increased administrative costs, providers say. 

While it’s unclear whether the update indicates a larger policy shift to reevaluate CMS’ approach to expand prior authorization within Medicare Part B, the adjustment is a step in the right direction, said Anders Gilberg, senior vice president of government affairs at the Medical Group Management Association.

“We’re pleased to see that CMS is evaluating prior authorization in the context of providing timely care to Medicare beneficiaries. As an organization, MGMA has strongly advocated for limiting the use of prior authorization in Medicare Part B, where it is generally limited,” Gilberg said in an email. 

A House committee advanced a bill last month that would streamline prior authorization requirements for Medicare Advantage carriers. Those insurers would have to establish electronic prior authorization programs that provide real-time decisions on certain items and services. 

About 13% of prior authorization denials by Medicare Advantage plans were for benefits that would otherwise have been covered under Medicare, according to an April report from HHS’ Office of Inspector General. 

CMS finalized a regulation last year to digitize the prior authorization process for Medicaid and private health plans offered through the exchanges. While the rule was withdrawn, the agency in January asked for input on electronic prior authorization standards. 

“Moving forward, we should pay attention to not only streamlining the process of prior authorization, but hopefully create additional rules that remove prior authorization for services of high clinical value and add more prior authorization for services that at best provide no clinical benefit and in some situations may cause harm,” Fendrick said. 

[ad_2]

Source link

slot gacor slot gacor togel macau slot hoki bandar togel slot dana slot mahjong link slot link slot777 slot gampang maxwin slot hoki slot mahjong slot maxwin slot mpo slot777 slot toto slot toto situs toto toto slot situs toto situs toto situs toto situs toto slot88 toto slot slot gacor thailand slot bet receh situs toto situs toto slot toto slot situs toto situs toto situs toto situs togel macau toto slot slot demo slot pulsa slot pragmatic situs toto deposit dana 10k surga slot toto slot link situs toto situs toto slot situs toto situs toto slot777 slot gacor situs toto slot slot pulsa 10k toto togel situs toto slot situs toto slot gacor terpercaya slot dana slot gacor pay4d agen sbobet kedai168 kedai168 deposit pulsa situs toto slot pulsa situs toto slot pulsa situs toto situs toto situs toto slot dana toto slot situs toto slot pulsa toto slot situs toto slot pulsa situs toto situs toto situs toto toto slot toto slot slot toto akun pro maxwin situs toto slot gacor maxwin slot gacor maxwin situs toto slot slot depo 10k toto slot toto slot situs toto situs toto toto slot toto slot toto slot toto togel slot toto togel situs toto situs toto toto slot slot gacor slot gacor slot gacor situs toto situs toto cytotec toto slot situs toto situs toto toto slot situs toto situs toto slot gacor maxwin slot gacor maxwin link slot 10k slot gacor maxwin slot gacor slot pulsa situs slot 10k slot 10k toto slot toto slot situs toto situs toto situs toto bandar togel 4d toto slot toto slot