KPMG audit report on Srei filed in time, say lenders in NCLT

The KPMG forensic audit report on Srei was submitted within three months of red-flagging the account by banks and was well within the timeline, lenders argued before the Kolkata Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on Thursday.

Hemant Kanoria, founder of Srei, had moved NCLT for setting aside the forensic audit by KPMG appointed by lenders.

Kanoria’s application mentioned that according to the provisions of a Reserve Bank of India (RBI) circular, dated July 3, 2017, an auditor, once appointed, was required to complete the audit and give the report within a maximum period of three months from the date of the Joint Lender’s Forum meeting authorising the same. On March 23, 2021, KPMG was appointed auditor by the lenders.

However, Abhinav Vashisht, representing lenders before the tribunal, said the time period starts from the red-flagging of the account which took place much later.

The NCLT had granted stay in any action being taken, including with regard to classification which was set aside by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. It was only thereafter that the red-flagging could be done.

Between October 12, 2021, and November 17, 2021, six banks red-flagged the account. The counsel also said that the timelines have to do with the RBI and banks and not the applicant and banks.

He also said that it cannot be argued that procedures that are envisaged under the RBI directives and therefore, under the statute because of the Banking Regulation Act are in any manner going to delay the insolvency resolution process. The insolvency process will continue without in any manner affecting the process or the timely resolution of the corporate debtor, the counsel said.

Kanoria’s application had cited an issue of parallel auditing in the wake of the corporate insolvency resolution process in Srei. It mentioned that according to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code process, the resolution professional of Srei had appointed BDO India LLP as the transaction auditor of Srei Infrastructure Finance.

The application also said that the “nature, scope and functions” of the audit conducted by BDO India and KPMG were overlapping, due to which there was likelihood of “concurrent, contradictory, and divergent” conclusions emerging between the two auditors.

Among his prayers, Kanoria sought an injunction order, restraining KPMG from continuing the audit of the corporate debtor. However, Ramji Srinivasan, representing KPMG, said the report had been submitted, the banks were in receipt, and they had further acted upon it.

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.

We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor